 
ＵＳＡ ヘンプ・ミュージアム
館長から皆さまへ
ヘンプの歴史
ヘンプと農業
ヘンプの医療と健康
ヘンプ食品
ヘンプ織物
ヘンプ縄と糸
ヘンプパルプ紙
ヘンプ建材
ヘンプ燃料
ヘンプ原料
ヘンプ溶剤
ヘンプ・プラスチック
ヘンプと環境
ヘンプと娯楽と精神世界
ヘンプと法律
ヘンプと法律
ヘンプとアメリカ憲法
医療ヘンプの法律
産業用ヘンプの法律
マリファナ税法 １９３７
解決策 禁止法廃止
政府とバトラーの論争
アラスカ合法化へ
書簡
マリファナ雑誌
館長の裁判闘争
法律関連図書
ヘンプと政治
ヘンプ貢献者
ミュージアム図書館
Ｔｏｐに戻る |
|
Before I ran for Congress in 1986, in a Democratic Primary from the First Congressional District of California, I wrote the Alaska Supreme Court for a copy of the above case, Ravin v. Alaska. Here is what I learned. Ravin, a citizen of Alaska, was stopped on the highway for a traffic violation and marijuana was found in his car. Ravin maintained a right to privacy in his car, and eventually the case came before the Alaska Supreme Court. The court make the case that on a public highway there was no such right. They went further to determine the limits of privacy, since there was a constitutional right in the Alaska Constitution. They determined that privacy right did include a citizen's house and yard, and that to undermine such an important right over a substance of questionable harm to society was unconstitutional. From a letter to the L.A. Times, some more facts: FACT #1: All adult citizens of Alaska, age 19 and older, have the right to both grow and smoke Cannabis in the privacy of their homes-four ounces per adult. The Alaska Supreme Court in Ravin v. State, 537 P;.2d 494 (Alaska 1975), held that, "the state constitutional right to privacy protects the possession and use of marijuana, by an adult, for personal use in the home in a non-commercial context." SOURCE: State of Alaska, Department of Law, Criminal Division, Bruce M. Botelho, Attorney General. P.O. Box 110300, Juneau, Alaska, 99811-0300.
|
